Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13291 - 13300 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13291 - 13300 of 30115 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
reasoning. But our standard of review of the constitutional issue is de novo, so the State’s argument about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130497 - 2014-11-25
reasoning. But our standard of review of the constitutional issue is de novo, so the State’s argument about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130497 - 2014-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35260 - 2009-01-20
State v. Kevin McCraney
is a question of law” which we review de novo. Flores, 183 Wis.2d at 609, 516 N.W.2d at 369. An attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2013-09-18
is a question of law” which we review de novo. Flores, 183 Wis.2d at 609, 516 N.W.2d at 369. An attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2013-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33828 - 2008-08-25
of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33828 - 2008-08-25
2006 WI APP 218
to undisputed facts. It therefore involves a question of law which we review de novo. Schauer v. Baker, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26563 - 2006-10-30
to undisputed facts. It therefore involves a question of law which we review de novo. Schauer v. Baker, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26563 - 2006-10-30
City of New Berlin v. William P. Servi
the challenge is to the court’s application of the implied consent to those facts, our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2008-09-26
the challenge is to the court’s application of the implied consent to those facts, our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2008-09-26
State v. Jeffrey Bland
review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18729 - 2005-06-27
review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18729 - 2005-06-27
State v. Darryl E. Pierce
the defense is a question of law we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶19 We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
the defense is a question of law we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. ¶19 We are satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rick E. Norem
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 8. Discussion ¶16 At issue is whether Norem’s actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 8. Discussion ¶16 At issue is whether Norem’s actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
Tammy J. Kaufman v. Donald E. Postle
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2612 - 2005-03-31
Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2612 - 2005-03-31