Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 72809 for petition.

State v. Robert Counter
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10303 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kaye D. Roberts
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9948 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58296 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Roberto M. Hinojosa v. John Husz
A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15170 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58296 - 2010-12-27

State v. Wayne T. Schimke
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16224 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Todd Michael Klema
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6791 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
affirm. No. 2019AP521-CR 2 In June 2017, Stewart petitioned for 159 additional days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254741 - 2020-02-19

[PDF] State v. Wayne T. Schimke
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16224 - 2017-09-21

Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County General Relief Agency
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9377 - 2005-03-31