Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13341 - 13350 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13341 - 13350 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶7 “In Terry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85468 - 2012-07-25
.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶7 “In Terry v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85468 - 2012-07-25
WI App 123 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case...
this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶54. ¶7 While it is undisputed that the complaint was not sworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87966 - 2012-11-28
this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶54. ¶7 While it is undisputed that the complaint was not sworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87966 - 2012-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06
. 2d 179, 192–193, 717 N.W.2d 1, 7. We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
judge is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. O’Neill, 2003 WI App 73, ¶11, 261 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101162 - 2013-08-21
judge is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. O’Neill, 2003 WI App 73, ¶11, 261 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101162 - 2013-08-21
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Timothy Kuhlman (Toledo, OH), Lesley De Paz (Minneapolis, MN), Emily LaGratta (NYC, NY), DCA Anya
/news/thirdbranch/oct24/fairnesspilot.htm - 2026-03-21
Timothy Kuhlman (Toledo, OH), Lesley De Paz (Minneapolis, MN), Emily LaGratta (NYC, NY), DCA Anya
/news/thirdbranch/oct24/fairnesspilot.htm - 2026-03-21
State v. Dean F. Bertrand
of undisputed facts is a question of law which we consider de novo. See NCR Corp. v. Department of Revenue, 112
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12605 - 2005-03-31
of undisputed facts is a question of law which we consider de novo. See NCR Corp. v. Department of Revenue, 112
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12605 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
on the motion. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923140 - 2025-03-05
on the motion. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We review de novo whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923140 - 2025-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant has been denied this right is an issue we review de novo. See id. A defendant seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
the defendant has been denied this right is an issue we review de novo. See id. A defendant seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de novo. State v. Hunt, 2014 WI 102, ¶22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we decide de novo. State v. Hunt, 2014 WI 102, ¶22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous….” Id. However, we “review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894144 - 2024-12-27
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous….” Id. However, we “review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894144 - 2024-12-27