Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13421 - 13430 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13421 - 13430 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Joseph W. Perry
are largely undisputed. His claim, therefore, raises a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12259 - 2005-03-31
are largely undisputed. His claim, therefore, raises a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12259 - 2005-03-31
Heier's Trucking, Inc. v. Waupaca County Solid Waste Management Board
and CROSS-APPEAL from two orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12694 - 2005-03-31
and CROSS-APPEAL from two orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12694 - 2005-03-31
Horst W. Josellis v. Pace Industries, Inc.
. Id. at 334. Using a de novo standard, Tesch reversed the trial court’s award of a $2,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6351 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 334. Using a de novo standard, Tesch reversed the trial court’s award of a $2,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5559 - 2017-09-19
was inadequate under WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5559 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
judgment. Sass appeals. ¶4 Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. Summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35601 - 2009-03-24
judgment. Sass appeals. ¶4 Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. Summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35601 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587210 - 2022-11-08
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587210 - 2022-11-08
[PDF]
Kathryn Robison v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
appeal. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19425 - 2017-09-21
appeal. DISCUSSION ¶11 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee Redevelopment Authority v. Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 2874
of the property’s “fair market value.” ¶8 Our review of the circuit court’s determination is de novo. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5171 - 2017-09-19
of the property’s “fair market value.” ¶8 Our review of the circuit court’s determination is de novo. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5171 - 2017-09-19
William Poluk v. J.N. Manson Agency, Inc.
to an insured presents an issue of law we decide de novo. Id. An insurance agent has the duty to act in good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4969 - 2005-03-31
to an insured presents an issue of law we decide de novo. Id. An insurance agent has the duty to act in good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4969 - 2005-03-31
Jay Thomas Widmer-Baum v. Jon Litscher
§ DOC ch. 303. We review this question de novo because a “court’s competency to proceed is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4949 - 2005-03-31
§ DOC ch. 303. We review this question de novo because a “court’s competency to proceed is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4949 - 2005-03-31