Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13571 - 13580 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13571 - 13580 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
State v. Juan R. Martinez
de novo, owing no deference to the trial court. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11056 - 2005-03-31
de novo, owing no deference to the trial court. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842, 853
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11056 - 2005-03-31
Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
. DISCUSSION We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12689 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12689 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law, which we review de novo. Nowell v. City of Wausau, 2013 WI 88, ¶19, 351 Wis. 2d 1, 838
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749464 - 2024-01-09
a question of law, which we review de novo. Nowell v. City of Wausau, 2013 WI 88, ¶19, 351 Wis. 2d 1, 838
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749464 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State ex rel. R.G. v. W.M.B., 159 Wis.2d 662, 666
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13386 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State ex rel. R.G. v. W.M.B., 159 Wis.2d 662, 666
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13386 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, we refer only to DHA’s decision in our discussion. ¶8 We are required to affirm DHA’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194087 - 2017-09-21
de novo, we refer only to DHA’s decision in our discussion. ¶8 We are required to affirm DHA’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sylvia M. Crawford v. Care Concepts, Inc.
of a statute to conceded facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Steinberg v. Jensen, 194 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15333 - 2017-09-21
of a statute to conceded facts is a question of law which we review de novo. Steinberg v. Jensen, 194 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 7
233, ¶11, 248 Wis. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. We review de novo the municipality’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317184 - 2021-02-08
233, ¶11, 248 Wis. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. We review de novo the municipality’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317184 - 2021-02-08
[PDF]
WI App 40
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our standard of review is de novo, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683128 - 2023-09-21
to a judgment as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). Our standard of review is de novo, and our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683128 - 2023-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 22
-de-sacs are to be minimized except when necessary due to topographical or environmental features
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511962 - 2022-06-08
-de-sacs are to be minimized except when necessary due to topographical or environmental features
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511962 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5568 - 2017-09-19
was inadequate under WIS. STAT. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5568 - 2017-09-19