Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13581 - 13590 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13581 - 13590 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789591 - 2024-04-17
unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789591 - 2024-04-17
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
State v. Timothy J. Meddaugh
to undisputed facts is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3714 - 2005-03-31
to undisputed facts is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3714 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sandra L. Wojtasiak v. Podiatry Associates
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 602. However, appellate courts ordinarily defer to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4301 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 602. However, appellate courts ordinarily defer to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4301 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Rydeski
consent statute to found facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11977 - 2017-09-21
consent statute to found facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Olen v. Phelps, 200 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11977 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony L.K.
conclusion de novo. State v. Goodrum, 152 Wis.2d 540, 546, 449 N.W.2d 41, 44 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11443 - 2005-03-31
conclusion de novo. State v. Goodrum, 152 Wis.2d 540, 546, 449 N.W.2d 41, 44 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. “[W]e review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We review de novo whether the facts at a preliminary hearing establish probable cause. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185401 - 2017-09-21
. We review de novo whether the facts at a preliminary hearing establish probable cause. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John G. Yager
. Such an application presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis.2d 1, 7-8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14694 - 2017-09-21
. Such an application presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis.2d 1, 7-8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rick Keiting v. Mike Skauge
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9529 - 2017-09-19
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9529 - 2017-09-19