Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13611 - 13620 of 49879 for our.
Search results 13611 - 13620 of 49879 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
could be challenged. After our independent review of the Record and the no-merit report, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62656 - 2011-04-11
could be challenged. After our independent review of the Record and the no-merit report, we concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62656 - 2011-04-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
requested new appointed appellate counsel to file a sentence modification motion. Our October 15, 2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
requested new appointed appellate counsel to file a sentence modification motion. Our October 15, 2019
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255475 - 2020-03-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
abandons on appeal. The motion was No. 2012AP1138-CR 2 denied. Upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93668 - 2014-09-15
abandons on appeal. The motion was No. 2012AP1138-CR 2 denied. Upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93668 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
monitoring. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102757 - 2013-10-03
monitoring. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102757 - 2013-10-03
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
. Based upon our independent review of the record, this court concludes that the no merit report correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14126 - 2005-03-31
. Based upon our independent review of the record, this court concludes that the no merit report correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14126 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Samantha E.
. Based upon our independent review of the record, this court concludes that the no merit report correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
. Based upon our independent review of the record, this court concludes that the no merit report correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2)(a)1; D.F.R., 147 Wis. 2d at 498-99. ¶7 Our conclusion is required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2)(a)1; D.F.R., 147 Wis. 2d at 498-99. ¶7 Our conclusion is required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
State v. Roger A. Urbick
in analyzing the facts of this case. In Williams we based our decision on the premise that an anonymous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31
in analyzing the facts of this case. In Williams we based our decision on the premise that an anonymous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31