Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 62306 for child support.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, during the shooting, three men—Edmond, Earnest Davis, and Eddie Davis and a two-year-old child— were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229421 - 2018-12-11

[PDF] Kelly Gilmore and * v. Laurice Westerman
Gilmore from another patron; (3) was the evidence sufficient to support the jury's verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8969 - 2017-09-19

Kelly Gilmore and * v. Laurice Westerman
; (3) was the evidence sufficient to support the jury's verdict that Westerman negligently failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8969 - 2005-03-31

L. M. S. v. William Earl Atkinson
medical expenses is not supported by credible evidence. ¶2 We affirm on all issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25293 - 2006-06-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was supported by Sarah’s affidavit averring that John did not visit or communicate with Adam for over a year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256774 - 2020-03-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the essential elements of his offense” of attempted sexual contact with a child— namely, that the alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218464 - 2018-08-30

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Amicus Brief of Coalition on Lead Emergency
-Respondents. NON-PARTY BRIEF OF COALITION ON LEAD EMERGENCY IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1108amicuscole.pdf - 2023-11-13

[PDF] State v. Frederick Gulley
entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of sexual assault of a child, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19524 - 2017-09-21

State v. Frederick Gulley
a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19524 - 2005-09-06

State v. Jessie L. Redmond
a judgment of conviction for two counts of second-degree sexual assault of a child as a repeater, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8820 - 2005-03-31