Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 16099 for probate.
Search results 13701 - 13710 of 16099 for probate.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consider the least restrictive setting for Robinson’s needs, but probation was not warranted in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207489 - 2018-01-22
consider the least restrictive setting for Robinson’s needs, but probation was not warranted in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207489 - 2018-01-22
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A. M.
of a child pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) and sentenced to twenty years of probation consecutive to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4119 - 2005-03-31
of a child pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) and sentenced to twenty years of probation consecutive to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4119 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lorraine Kostuch v. Robert E. Lea, Jr.
omitted). In addition, the personal representative of an estate is subject to the probate court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4723 - 2017-09-19
omitted). In addition, the personal representative of an estate is subject to the probate court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4723 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a restitution order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
of a restitution order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard C. Plank
’ probation. ¶4 On September 8, 2003, the court accepted Plank’s no contest plea. At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17796 - 2017-09-21
’ probation. ¶4 On September 8, 2003, the court accepted Plank’s no contest plea. At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17796 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it was rejecting probation—there was a high need to protect the public, which would be accomplished by removing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180853 - 2017-09-21
it was rejecting probation—there was a high need to protect the public, which would be accomplished by removing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180853 - 2017-09-21
Eddie Cannon v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
, 1989, State of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7768 - 2005-03-31
, 1989, State of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7768 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution obligations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94791 - 2013-04-01
order that “set[] forth as a condition of probation the payment of outstanding restitution obligations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94791 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
State v. Jose Soto
and a lengthy probation period on the other. Although Soto claims he maintained his innocence throughout
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14353 - 2014-09-15
and a lengthy probation period on the other. Although Soto claims he maintained his innocence throughout
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
compliance with probation terms. Because it was not character evidence, the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32389 - 2014-09-15
compliance with probation terms. Because it was not character evidence, the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32389 - 2014-09-15