Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13731 - 13740 of 16104 for probate.
Search results 13731 - 13740 of 16104 for probate.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in and out of custody while the CHIPS order was in force. At one point, he absconded from probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379743 - 2021-06-22
in and out of custody while the CHIPS order was in force. At one point, he absconded from probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379743 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Guy N. Giese
the conviction. The final claim is that the ten-year prison term and consecutive ten- year probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
the conviction. The final claim is that the ten-year prison term and consecutive ten- year probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10925 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
to consider probation or thirty days or less in jail. He argued that Sullivan had already been punished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
to consider probation or thirty days or less in jail. He argued that Sullivan had already been punished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of twelve years which was stayed in favor of consecutive twenty years’ probation. A postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56807 - 2014-09-15
of twelve years which was stayed in favor of consecutive twenty years’ probation. A postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56807 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Eddie Cannon v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7768 - 2017-09-19
of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7768 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
probation because it determined that Prather needed to go to prison for both punishment and rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31303 - 2007-12-26
probation because it determined that Prather needed to go to prison for both punishment and rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31303 - 2007-12-26
CA Blank Order
that sentence be withheld and Nutten be placed on consecutive probation for three years on the burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106582 - 2014-12-16
that sentence be withheld and Nutten be placed on consecutive probation for three years on the burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106582 - 2014-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
: three received only probation and one was fined $530. ¶14 First, “similarly charged” may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109391 - 2014-03-25
: three received only probation and one was fined $530. ¶14 First, “similarly charged” may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109391 - 2014-03-25
State v. Frank L. Little
for both convictions and placed Little on probation for one year. Little appeals only the criminal damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7270 - 2005-03-31
for both convictions and placed Little on probation for one year. Little appeals only the criminal damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7270 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sentence of less than two years or probation. ¶6 The trial court discussed the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21
a sentence of less than two years or probation. ¶6 The trial court discussed the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106275 - 2017-09-21