Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1381 - 1390 of 5793 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu double rumah modern Tigi Barat Kabupaten Deiyai Papua.
Search results 1381 - 1390 of 5793 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu double rumah modern Tigi Barat Kabupaten Deiyai Papua.
State v. Adrienne Luber
Luber contends that a retrial on the PAC charge violates her constitutional guarantee against double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2275 - 2005-03-31
Luber contends that a retrial on the PAC charge violates her constitutional guarantee against double
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2275 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andrew B. Collette
postconviction counsel was ineffective, that the sentencing violated his double jeopardy protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
postconviction counsel was ineffective, that the sentencing violated his double jeopardy protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, issue preclusion, collateral estoppel, estoppel by the record, and double jeopardy,’ [the offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143028 - 2017-09-21
, issue preclusion, collateral estoppel, estoppel by the record, and double jeopardy,’ [the offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143028 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
County: Patricia D. mcmahon, Judge. Affirmed; request for double costs granted. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
County: Patricia D. mcmahon, Judge. Affirmed; request for double costs granted. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
State v. Jovan T. Mull
postconviction motion. He raises seven issues: (1) whether his constitutional double jeopardy rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4632 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. He raises seven issues: (1) whether his constitutional double jeopardy rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4632 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard L. Munson
multiplicitous, in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. We reject the arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10678 - 2005-03-31
multiplicitous, in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. We reject the arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10678 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
; request for double costs granted. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28466 - 2014-09-15
; request for double costs granted. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28466 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The doctrine’s underlying purpose is to prevent double recovery. Id.3 ¶11 We explained in Scheideler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
). The doctrine’s underlying purpose is to prevent double recovery. Id.3 ¶11 We explained in Scheideler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, collateral estoppel, estoppel by the record, and double jeopardy,’ [the offender] requested dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143028 - 2015-06-15
, collateral estoppel, estoppel by the record, and double jeopardy,’ [the offender] requested dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143028 - 2015-06-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. Winkel
the amount of time more than doubled without adequate explanation by Attorney Winkel, the fee application
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20615 - 2017-09-21
the amount of time more than doubled without adequate explanation by Attorney Winkel, the fee application
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20615 - 2017-09-21