Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 30097 for de.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 30097 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
of historical fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. We apply those facts to the applicable law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112226 - 2014-05-29
of historical fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. We apply those facts to the applicable law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112226 - 2014-05-29
State v. Douglas D.
. An appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
. An appellate court is not bound by the trial court’s conclusions of law and must decide the matter de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
a question of law which we review de novo, we nevertheless value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
a question of law which we review de novo, we nevertheless value a trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35930 - 2009-03-18
meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35930 - 2009-03-18
County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5311 - 2005-03-31
) presents a question of constitutional law, our review is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5311 - 2005-03-31
The Boerke Company, Inc. v. Protein Genetics, Inc.
a trial court's decision on a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6664 - 2005-03-31
a trial court's decision on a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tyrone Price
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Squires, 211 Wis.2d 876, 880, 565 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15281 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Squires, 211 Wis.2d 876, 880, 565 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15281 - 2005-03-31
Michael D. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. Jacobs v. Karls, 178 Wis.2d 268, 273, 504 N.W.2d 353, 355 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
WI App 164 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP416-CR Complete Title...
review de novo. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶26, 299 Wis. 2d 561, 729 N.W.2d 396
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73703 - 2011-12-13
review de novo. DOR v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc., 2007 WI 27, ¶26, 299 Wis. 2d 561, 729 N.W.2d 396
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73703 - 2011-12-13