Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1391 - 1400 of 74550 for public records.
Search results 1391 - 1400 of 74550 for public records.
State v. Christopher N. Pflieger
with the protection of the public, the gravity of the offense and the rehabilitative needs of the defendant.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6921 - 2005-03-31
with the protection of the public, the gravity of the offense and the rehabilitative needs of the defendant.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher N. Pflieger
for the minimum amount of custody or confinement which is consistent with the protection of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6921 - 2017-09-20
for the minimum amount of custody or confinement which is consistent with the protection of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6921 - 2017-09-20
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
Records Management Committee Public access to justice Access to Justice Commission Wisconsin Commission
/news/thirdbranch/jun23/jointmeeting.htm - 2026-03-26
Records Management Committee Public access to justice Access to Justice Commission Wisconsin Commission
/news/thirdbranch/jun23/jointmeeting.htm - 2026-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
State v. Jonathan S.
transferred his custody to corrections because it did not make sufficient findings on the record as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5131 - 2005-03-31
transferred his custody to corrections because it did not make sufficient findings on the record as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Victoria L. Stark
disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13784 - 2014-09-15
disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13784 - 2014-09-15
State v. James Terry II
limited review in this area reflects the strong public policy against interference with sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3078 - 2005-03-31
limited review in this area reflects the strong public policy against interference with sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Terry II
in this area reflects the strong public policy against interference with sentencing discretion; we presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3078 - 2017-09-19
in this area reflects the strong public policy against interference with sentencing discretion; we presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3078 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court table of pending cases
Records Management Committee Public access to justice Access to Justice Commission Wisconsin Commission
/supreme/sc_tabpend.jsp
Records Management Committee Public access to justice Access to Justice Commission Wisconsin Commission
/supreme/sc_tabpend.jsp
State v. Victoria L. Stark
disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13784 - 2005-03-31
disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13784 - 2005-03-31