Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13901 - 13910 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 13901 - 13910 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Joshua Slagoski v. Phil Kingston
. Joshua Slagoski appeals from a pair of orders dismissing his claims for certiorari review of a prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4948 - 2005-03-31
. Joshua Slagoski appeals from a pair of orders dismissing his claims for certiorari review of a prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4948 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Prairie) and dismissed his case because he did not properly serve his claim alleging “Excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182430 - 2017-09-21
Prairie) and dismissed his case because he did not properly serve his claim alleging “Excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182430 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 In 2002, Gressel filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93884 - 2014-09-15
. ¶5 In 2002, Gressel filed a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15
motion. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94020 - 2013-03-12
a sufficient reason for failing to raise his postconviction claims during the course of his no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94020 - 2013-03-12
[PDF]
State v. Gilberto Flores
notice of appeal, Flores claims to appeal from an order dated April 15, 2001. There is no such order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3922 - 2017-09-20
notice of appeal, Flores claims to appeal from an order dated April 15, 2001. There is no such order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3922 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the Commission made several factual errors. We conclude that, regardless of these claimed errors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235237 - 2019-02-15
the Commission made several factual errors. We conclude that, regardless of these claimed errors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235237 - 2019-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. Boose claims the circuit court erred when it summarily denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05
his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. Boose claims the circuit court erred when it summarily denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48732 - 2010-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10