Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14121 - 14130 of 30154 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, subject to de novo review. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17

Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
judgment applies the same methodology as the circuit court and we decide the matter de novo. Crowbridge v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9471 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 163
and apply them to undisputed facts de novo. Ashford v. DHA, 177 Wis. 2d 34, 39-40, 501 N.W.2d 824 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682452 - 2023-07-26

[PDF] NOTICE
¶5 Summary judgments are reviewed de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Bilda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gamel S. Hegwood
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id. The test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5491 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-694 (1984). We review de novo whether a postconviction motion alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641612 - 2023-04-06

COURT OF APPEALS
of this case meet this definition is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Trochinski, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91764 - 2013-01-22

State v. Donald G. Kester
principles as applied to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16