Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 24492 for extending.
Search results 14181 - 14190 of 24492 for extending.
State v. Jose R.
the trial court called, without further specification, “an extended period of time.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
the trial court called, without further specification, “an extended period of time.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. It also imposed the minimum fine of $600. After sentencing, Amburn filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164081 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. It also imposed the minimum fine of $600. After sentencing, Amburn filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164081 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that close family relationship does not extend to a best friend, whether that best friend is a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141316 - 2015-05-06
that close family relationship does not extend to a best friend, whether that best friend is a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141316 - 2015-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months of extended supervision for the intimidation count. The circuit court also imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984598 - 2025-07-22
months of extended supervision for the intimidation count. The circuit court also imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984598 - 2025-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and three years’ extended supervision, imposed and stayed in favor of five years’ probation. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
confinement and three years’ extended supervision, imposed and stayed in favor of five years’ probation. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation of six years divided as four years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
recommendation of six years divided as four years’ initial confinement and two years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and six years’ extended supervision, to run concurrent with a reconfinement sentence Siudzinski
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254441 - 2020-02-18
confinement and six years’ extended supervision, to run concurrent with a reconfinement sentence Siudzinski
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254441 - 2020-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ stated concern for additional victims and their own safety, TEU officers reasonably extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07
’ stated concern for additional victims and their own safety, TEU officers reasonably extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Enrique Vizcaino
. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the traffic stop was unreasonably extended beyond its original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25988 - 2017-09-21
. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the traffic stop was unreasonably extended beyond its original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the maximum sentence of seven and one-half years’ initial confinement (IC) followed by five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05
the maximum sentence of seven and one-half years’ initial confinement (IC) followed by five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218419 - 2018-09-05