Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1431 - 1440 of 5316 for text.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
out she had been using another student’s cell phone to send text messages. V.A.L. testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
of an unambiguous statute as long as the scope, context, and purpose are ascertainable from the text
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168034 - 2017-09-21

State v. Mark E. Nelson
as they are ascertainable from the text and structure of the statute itself. Id., ¶48. We do so in part because words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25275 - 2006-06-27

COURT OF APPEALS
student’s cell phone to send text messages. V.A.L. testified that Lowe took her into the teachers’ lounge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102038 - 2013-09-17

[PDF] WI 58
an essential part of the text. Rather, applying the plain words of the entire text, I conclude
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29150 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
U.S. at 221. ¶26 A comparison of the text of the statutory standard with the constitutional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242219 - 2019-08-13

[PDF] Frontsheet
U.S. at 221. ¶26 A comparison of the text of the statutory standard with the constitutional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242179 - 2019-08-13

[PDF] Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
. at 654). Since pre-emption turns on congressional intent, we look first to the text of ERISA. "[W]e
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 46
that the person does not meet the criteria for commitment No. 2008AP52 9 on the text
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51070 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert W. Sweat
of the statutory text. If the meaning of the statutory text is unambiguous, we need not look further. Id. at 220
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17038 - 2005-03-31