Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14321 - 14330 of 67853 for law.

COURT OF APPEALS
of law. Davis did not, however, establish whether he personally occupied the house on 58th Street when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56188 - 2010-11-01

Town of LaGrange v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
the Sidhus’ application.[3] An administrative law judge (ALJ) upheld this ruling at an ensuing contested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7132 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Deandre Brown
. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND APPLICABLE LAW ¶7 In State v. Kutz, 2003 WI App 205, ¶11, 267 Wis. 2d 531, 671
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19087 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, that the vehicle’s rear license plate was not illuminated as required by law. It concluded that based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15

[PDF] WI APP 144
that the supreme court had criticized Berg in Doyle and reaffirmed that the four-corners rule was the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29220 - 2014-09-15

Susan M. Lodl v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
and Pewaukee were entitled to immunity under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(4) because there was no law or rule regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2187 - 2005-03-31

State v. Matthew Tyler
and law. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. The trial court’s factual findings will not be disturbed unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and that the court’s denial of his motion was based on an error of law. I disagree and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694915 - 2023-08-25

COURT OF APPEALS
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110871 - 2014-04-23

Wayne A. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.
of William Skemp Law Firm, S.C. of La Crosse. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31