Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Susan Shoemaker v. The Hearst Corporation
in selecting Wheaton. When the small-claims court granted judgment to Hearst, she sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3563 - 2005-03-31
in selecting Wheaton. When the small-claims court granted judgment to Hearst, she sought de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3563 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient factual basis is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
a sufficient factual basis is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Payette, 2008 WI App 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. We review de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82437 - 2012-05-15
a question of law. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21. We review de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82437 - 2012-05-15
State v. Henry A. Phillips
The court's use of a penalty enhancer to the undisputed facts here presents a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
The court's use of a penalty enhancer to the undisputed facts here presents a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
subject to de novo review. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W.2d 668
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
Joseph Sorrel v. Livesey Company LLC
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25035 - 2006-05-03
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25035 - 2006-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims are procedurally barred presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921004 - 2025-03-04
claims are procedurally barred presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921004 - 2025-03-04
A T Polishing Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of law which we may review de novo. See Klusendorf Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. v. LIRC, 110 Wis. 2d 328, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2235 - 2005-03-31
of law which we may review de novo. See Klusendorf Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. v. LIRC, 110 Wis. 2d 328, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2235 - 2005-03-31
WI App 130 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1955-CR Complete Titl...
review de novo. See Stuart v. Weisflog’s Showroom Gallery, Inc., 2008 WI 22, ¶11, 308 Wis. 2d 103, 746
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70096 - 2011-09-27
review de novo. See Stuart v. Weisflog’s Showroom Gallery, Inc., 2008 WI 22, ¶11, 308 Wis. 2d 103, 746
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70096 - 2011-09-27
Rick Keiting v. Mike Skauge
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9529 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law which we review de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9529 - 2005-03-31