Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14351 - 14360 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” Fond du Lac Cnty. v. Helen E.F., 2012 WI 50, ¶10, 340 Wis. 2d 500, 814 N.W.2d 179. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140353 - 2015-04-22
review de novo.” Fond du Lac Cnty. v. Helen E.F., 2012 WI 50, ¶10, 340 Wis. 2d 500, 814 N.W.2d 179. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140353 - 2015-04-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82768 - 2014-09-15
3 Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82768 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that Copeland is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98391 - 2013-06-25
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶5 We conclude that Copeland is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98391 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Tyrone Price
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Squires, 211 Wis.2d 876, 880, 565 N.W.2d 309, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15281 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Squires, 211 Wis.2d 876, 880, 565 N.W.2d 309, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15281 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. State v. Truax, 2009 WI App 60, ¶8, 318 Wis. 2d 113, 767 N.W.2d 369. ¶6 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233836 - 2019-01-30
we review de novo. State v. Truax, 2009 WI App 60, ¶8, 318 Wis. 2d 113, 767 N.W.2d 369. ¶6 Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233836 - 2019-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Irvin Ryan
to this appeal is disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18127 - 2017-09-21
to this appeal is disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the court’s authority� to which we apply a de novo standard of review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
of the court’s authority� to which we apply a de novo standard of review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Keith S. Krause
, subject to de novo review. Baker, 169 Wis. 2d at 78. No. 2005AP472-CR 5 ¶8 Krause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21166 - 2017-09-21
, subject to de novo review. Baker, 169 Wis. 2d at 78. No. 2005AP472-CR 5 ¶8 Krause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21166 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 720 N.W.2d 695. We review questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35201 - 2009-01-12
, 720 N.W.2d 695. We review questions of law de novo. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, ¶8, 299
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35201 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” State v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498, 501 (1983) (quoted source omitted). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06
.’” State v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498, 501 (1983) (quoted source omitted). We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06