Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14361 - 14370 of 63934 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with about 252 grams, or nearly nine ounces, of cocaine and outfitted him with an audio recording device.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75723 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 194
on the record….” Rosario now appeals. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND APPLICABLE LAW A. Summary Judgment. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29585 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert K.
in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only for so long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7669 - 2017-09-19

Waushara County Department of Health and Family Services v. James B.
determining that Nah-Lin’s parental rights would in fact be terminated. According to James, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2248 - 2005-03-31

Leo W. Ziulkowski v. Gregory M. Nierengarten
in this trial? [JUROR]: I don't think I could. The record reflects that the trial court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11095 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lisimba Love
the seriousness of his prior record and punished him for failing to accept responsibility for this crime because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3765 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Beth LaBatte
to accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.” State v. Speer, 176 Wis.2d 1101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14942 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Gerald A. Edson
failure to electronically record his police interview; (4) the charges were multiplicitous; (5) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20

Tony D. Walker v. Gary R. McCaughtry
by a writ of certiorari. See Wis. Stat. § 893.735(2) (1997-98).[2] Because the facts of record concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2640 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, “a reviewing court may not find, based on the record, that there was a valid waiver of counsel.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59567 - 2011-01-31