Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14371 - 14380 of 30191 for de.
Search results 14371 - 14380 of 30191 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. We therefore face a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26805 - 2006-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. The threshold inquiry is whether the State breached the plea agreement. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
de novo. Id. The threshold inquiry is whether the State breached the plea agreement. Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110255 - 2014-04-14
2008 WI APP 90
review de novo. State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116, 124, 589 N.W.2d 370 (1999). In most circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32844 - 2011-06-14
review de novo. State v. Zarnke, 224 Wis. 2d 116, 124, 589 N.W.2d 370 (1999). In most circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32844 - 2011-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 We review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
¶6 We review de novo whether a jury instruction is a correct statement of the law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56874 - 2010-11-17
Frontsheet
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25
department clerk as a de facto court clerk in those cases was unconstitutional. Although he did adjudicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53820 - 2010-08-25
Kelly S. Lee v. James M. Kent
and depends on the father here to provide for what was claimed.” [4] No testimony was taken at the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2779 - 2005-03-31
and depends on the father here to provide for what was claimed.” [4] No testimony was taken at the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2779 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jo A. Kain
is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See id. Kain fails to establish the first two elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2778 - 2005-03-31
is a constitutional question that we review de novo. See id. Kain fails to establish the first two elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2778 - 2005-03-31
Edwin D. Moehagen v. City of Chippewa Falls
that this court determines de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 304, 538 NW.2d 588, 598 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15314 - 2005-03-31
that this court determines de novo. See Jocz v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 273, 304, 538 NW.2d 588, 598 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15314 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence Northern
. § 971.23 is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2005-03-31
. § 971.23 is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6107 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
language, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Kailin v. Armstrong, 2002 WI App 70, ¶18, 252
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59543 - 2011-02-01
language, which is a question of law that we review de novo. Kailin v. Armstrong, 2002 WI App 70, ¶18, 252
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59543 - 2011-02-01