Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14391 - 14400 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63166 - 2011-04-25
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63166 - 2011-04-25
State v. Jason S. Petri
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶9 Petri argues that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14748 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
, and voluntary. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100, ¶40, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. We consider de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
question we review de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶10 Notably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104443 - 2013-11-18
question we review de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶10 Notably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104443 - 2013-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61310 - 2011-03-16
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61310 - 2011-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, our review is de novo, and we employ the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85446 - 2012-07-25
judgment, our review is de novo, and we employ the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85446 - 2012-07-25
Daniel Gage v. John Hagen
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14832 - 2005-03-31
Frankie Kirk Rottier v. John Edward Walsh
, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de novo. See Micro-Managers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14977 - 2005-03-31
, 636, 586 N.W.2d 863, 866 (1998). And we review an unambiguous document de novo. See Micro-Managers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14977 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact, upholding them unless they are clearly erroneous, and then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
findings of fact, upholding them unless they are clearly erroneous, and then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and therefore we review that question de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21
, and therefore we review that question de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d 710, 817 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21