Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14461 - 14470 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
State v. Margaret C.
termination of parental rights presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Patricia A.P., 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
termination of parental rights presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Patricia A.P., 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a “swale,” which is part of the natural watershed from the Des Plaines River. The swale runs primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996776 - 2025-08-20
is a “swale,” which is part of the natural watershed from the Des Plaines River. The swale runs primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996776 - 2025-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶6 Sufficiency of evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51566 - 2010-06-30
of Review ¶6 Sufficiency of evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51566 - 2010-06-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 292 Wis. 2d 716, 715 N.W.2d 727. Whether a sentence is ambiguous is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
, 292 Wis. 2d 716, 715 N.W.2d 727. Whether a sentence is ambiguous is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132254 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
from the code phone. [3] Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40272 - 2009-08-31
from the code phone. [3] Reinl argues the standard of review is de novo, but she misunderstands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40272 - 2009-08-31
Danny Prince Hall v. Gerald Berge
. On certiorari, we review the prison disciplinary committee’s decision de novo and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13510 - 2005-03-31
. On certiorari, we review the prison disciplinary committee’s decision de novo and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13510 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
orders of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
orders of the circuit court for Waukesha County: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28
De Peters filed the no-merit report. Attorney Olivia Garman was later substituted as appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1029613 - 2025-10-28