Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14471 - 14480 of 73107 for petition.

State v. Albert S.
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14332 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] STATE OF WISCONSIN IN THE SUPREME COURT
PETITION The Director of State Courts hereby petitions this court to repeal SCR 70.38 – 70.39
/supreme/docs/1103petitionmemo.pdf - 2011-07-05

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts three new cases
and Gabrielle Young, Petitioners, Governor Tony Evers, in his official capacity; Nathan Atkinson, Stephen
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac102723.pdf - 2023-10-27

[PDF] Peter J. Ambler v. Richard F. Rice
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
January 2013. In November 2013, the State filed a petition alleging as grounds for termination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149921 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110580 - 2014-04-23

Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32736 - 2008-05-19

Carlos Frum v. Lee I. Wigod
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10366 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dodge Co. Department of Human Services v. Rachel W.
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3193 - 2017-09-19