Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 14491 - 14500 of 58506 for speedy trial.
WI App 142 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP85-CR Complete Titl...
on the videotaped interview presented at trial. We conclude there was no violation because the victim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70931 - 2011-10-18
on the videotaped interview presented at trial. We conclude there was no violation because the victim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70931 - 2011-10-18
2007 WI APP 256
. §§ 19.45(2) and 939.05.[2] Jensen contends that the trial court submitted an erroneous jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30828 - 2007-12-18
. §§ 19.45(2) and 939.05.[2] Jensen contends that the trial court submitted an erroneous jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30828 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responsibility of G.H. and J.H. N.J. contested the allegations, and a court trial was held on October 22-24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155669 - 2017-09-21
responsibility of G.H. and J.H. N.J. contested the allegations, and a court trial was held on October 22-24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155669 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stanley A. Samuel
that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16059 - 2005-03-31
that the witness’s statement was coerced. We conclude that he did and thus reverse the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16059 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley A. Samuel
the trial court’s order to the contrary. Our decision necessitates a reversal of all Samuel’s convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s order to the contrary. Our decision necessitates a reversal of all Samuel’s convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16059 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
decision, 2 granted the defendant a new trial under its discretionary authority to reverse convictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143992 - 2017-09-21
decision, 2 granted the defendant a new trial under its discretionary authority to reverse convictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143992 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
,[2] granted the defendant a new trial under its discretionary authority to reverse convictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143992 - 2015-07-06
,[2] granted the defendant a new trial under its discretionary authority to reverse convictions
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143992 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
Frontsheet
that occurred in late 2004. At trial, the State presented testimony from Nathan Jefferson ("Jefferson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211281 - 2018-06-05
that occurred in late 2004. At trial, the State presented testimony from Nathan Jefferson ("Jefferson
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211281 - 2018-06-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a dangerous weapon. The trial court sentenced Diaz to life imprisonment with eligibility for extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350530 - 2021-03-30
of a dangerous weapon. The trial court sentenced Diaz to life imprisonment with eligibility for extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350530 - 2021-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting the alleged error. We elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84177 - 2014-09-15
to raise this issue by failing to make a post-trial motion asserting the alleged error. We elect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84177 - 2014-09-15