Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 14501 - 14510 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
State v. James W.
“clearly erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25338 - 2006-05-30
“clearly erroneous” standard in a termination-of-parental-rights case). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25338 - 2006-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48465 - 2010-03-31
State v. Ryan C. Rumlow
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kohler Company v. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Armstrong v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8688 - 2017-09-19
decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Armstrong v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8688 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of such a right is a constitutional question we review de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104443 - 2017-09-21
of such a right is a constitutional question we review de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Trochinski, 2002 WI 56, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 38, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91764 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Trochinski, 2002 WI 56, ¶16, 253 Wis. 2d 38, 644 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91764 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jose S.
de novo, however, whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17899 - 2017-09-21
de novo, however, whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17899 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts have exercised inherent authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts have exercised inherent authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.2d 414. Such review is not de novo. See id. On appeal to this court, we apply the same standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208821 - 2018-02-21
.2d 414. Such review is not de novo. See id. On appeal to this court, we apply the same standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208821 - 2018-02-21
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
of both counts. He appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. After a jury trial in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31
of both counts. He appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. After a jury trial in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15158 - 2005-03-31