Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 63935 for records/1000.
Search results 14561 - 14570 of 63935 for records/1000.
Sandra L. Pauloski v. Stephen J. Pauloski
the circuit court’s discretion. We will affirm the circuit court if the record shows that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5874 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s discretion. We will affirm the circuit court if the record shows that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5874 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Yelk
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Yelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11855 - 2005-03-31
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Yelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11855 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response, and he has responded. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
was advised of his right to file a response, and he has responded. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
State v. Eric J. Yelk
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Yelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11851 - 2005-03-31
of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack arguable merit. Yelk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11851 - 2005-03-31
Rosemarie Pitz v. Bernard Pitz
, the circuit court found that Bernard’s warranty deed was not recorded until April 14, 1992,[1] after Cecelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14625 - 2005-03-31
, the circuit court found that Bernard’s warranty deed was not recorded until April 14, 1992,[1] after Cecelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14625 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kerry R.
for the trial, which was November 15. The record accounting of this was set forth above—the transcript suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26315 - 2006-08-28
for the trial, which was November 15. The record accounting of this was set forth above—the transcript suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26315 - 2006-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record to determine if it supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63381 - 2011-05-02
. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record to determine if it supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63381 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
State v. Travis Blanks
, 176 Wis.2d 230, 237, 500 N.W.2d 345, 348 (Ct. App. 1993). Where the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8701 - 2017-09-19
, 176 Wis.2d 230, 237, 500 N.W.2d 345, 348 (Ct. App. 1993). Where the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8701 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Paul Fochs v. John Buch
if the court considered facts of record and its reasoning results in a rational and legally sound decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13928 - 2014-09-15
if the court considered facts of record and its reasoning results in a rational and legally sound decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13928 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Otis J. Martin
an affirmative duty to examine the record and question the defendant and/or counsel in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13734 - 2014-09-15
an affirmative duty to examine the record and question the defendant and/or counsel in open court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13734 - 2014-09-15