Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14601 - 14610 of 16425 for commentating.

[PDF] State v. Kirk Bintzler
the trial about a comment a juror made in the courthouse hallway during the trial. The juror told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10256 - 2017-09-20

State v. Emmett White
that this was inconsistent with Martin’s previous statements, but the value of impeaching this single comment from Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10472 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
litem’s comments was miniscule compared with the overwhelming evidence supporting the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82304 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 784 (1979) (citation omitted). “The prosecutor may ‘comment on the evidence, detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05

State v. Robert A. Mendoza
, in these comments, only expressly referred to the three jurors who had committed felonies, he also moved to strike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sokaogon Chippewa Community (Mole Lake Band of Lake Superior Chippewas) v. Schenck
analysis as a precursor to rejecting the independent contractor defense: The courts and commentators
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18759 - 2017-09-21

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
the municipality and the damage cap. Under the relevant criteria by commentators Wright and Miller, the cap
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16908 - 2005-03-31

WI App 15 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2808 Complete Title of...
primary sentencing factors. We have reviewed the court’s sentencing comments and observe no error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76099 - 2012-02-28

2009 WI APP 4
. This was not an offhand comment or a footnote. Instead, it was a successful attempt to define a statute so that future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35064 - 2009-01-27

State v. Daniel R. Buttner
, and commented on its relevance, as follows: I would just briefly point out that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14077 - 2005-03-31