Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 30072 for de.
Search results 14701 - 14710 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
Donna Sue Spielman v. Jeffrey Allen Spielman
the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis. 2d 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3030 - 2017-09-19
the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis. 2d 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daryl O. Norris
a defendant’s constitutional speedy trial right has been violated is a question this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5675 - 2017-09-19
a defendant’s constitutional speedy trial right has been violated is a question this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5675 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
that this court reviews de novo. Mikrut, 273 Wis. 2d 76, ¶7. The State asserts that Cotton forfeited his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037601 - 2025-11-18
Eau Claire County v. Robert P.
of law that this court reviews de novo. In re Michelle A.D., 181 Wis.2d 917, 922-23, 512 N.W.2d 248, 249
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2006-11-14
of law that this court reviews de novo. In re Michelle A.D., 181 Wis.2d 917, 922-23, 512 N.W.2d 248, 249
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15161 - 2006-11-14
State v. Michael G.
been filed. This involves a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12566 - 2005-03-31
been filed. This involves a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12566 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shermell G. Tabor
is disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis. 2d 400, 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17874 - 2005-03-31
is disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis. 2d 400, 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17874 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee Post #2874 v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
Robert J. McElwain v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3896 - 2005-03-31
reviewing a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3896 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶6 Sufficiency of evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51566 - 2010-06-30
of Review ¶6 Sufficiency of evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51566 - 2010-06-30
Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
appeal raises a question of law—the interpretation and application of a statute—which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
appeal raises a question of law—the interpretation and application of a statute—which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31