Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14711 - 14720 of 30185 for de.
Search results 14711 - 14720 of 30185 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603 N.W.2d 541 (1999). Then, we review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70133 - 2014-09-15
of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293, 316, 603 N.W.2d 541 (1999). Then, we review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70133 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35711 - 2014-09-15
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35711 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Vernon County v. Gary E. Wolfgram
by the court meet statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4534 - 2017-09-19
by the court meet statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4534 - 2017-09-19
State v. David Ameen
N.W.2d 651, 654 (Ct. App. 1996). However, we value a trial court’s decision in spite of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13810 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 651, 654 (Ct. App. 1996). However, we value a trial court’s decision in spite of our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13810 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jennifer L. Anderson
). We review constitutional questions de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19414 - 2005-08-24
). We review constitutional questions de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19414 - 2005-08-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶14 Trial counsel explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72316 - 2014-09-15
was constitutionally ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶14 Trial counsel explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72316 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Urdahl, 2005 WI App 191, ¶11, 286 Wis. 2d 476, 704 N.W.2d 324 (citation omitted). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395050 - 2021-07-21
. Urdahl, 2005 WI App 191, ¶11, 286 Wis. 2d 476, 704 N.W.2d 324 (citation omitted). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395050 - 2021-07-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8483 - 2017-09-19
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8483 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21
). Whether a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13092 - 2017-09-21