Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14781 - 14790 of 63580 for records/1000.
Search results 14781 - 14790 of 63580 for records/1000.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453186 - 2021-11-16
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453186 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
by the No. 96-1148 -12- We conclude that the undisputed facts of record demonstrate Ciarpaglini’s
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10723 - 2017-09-20
by the No. 96-1148 -12- We conclude that the undisputed facts of record demonstrate Ciarpaglini’s
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10723 - 2017-09-20
Village of Germantown v. Frederick A. Wittenberger
because the defendant’s no contest plea saved time and court costs, there was an ample record from which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7599 - 2005-03-31
because the defendant’s no contest plea saved time and court costs, there was an ample record from which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124664 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124664 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
when it polled the jury after the verdict was read. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
when it polled the jury after the verdict was read. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648358 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
right to file a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Tracey T. Williams
. This court affirms. ¶2 According to the criminal complaints and other portions of the records, on July 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6242 - 2017-09-19
. This court affirms. ¶2 According to the criminal complaints and other portions of the records, on July 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6242 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677339 - 2023-07-11
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677339 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174324 - 2017-09-21
). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174324 - 2017-09-21