Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14831 - 14840 of 17230 for probate/1000.
Search results 14831 - 14840 of 17230 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his other counsel, who represented him at a 1998 probation revocation hearing, to investigate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
his other counsel, who represented him at a 1998 probation revocation hearing, to investigate his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
Eddie Cannon v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
, 1989, State of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7768 - 2005-03-31
, 1989, State of Wisconsin probation and parole agents, together with members of the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7768 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A. M.
of a child pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) and sentenced to twenty years of probation consecutive to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4119 - 2005-03-31
of a child pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) and sentenced to twenty years of probation consecutive to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4119 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 5
Helmbrecht on thirty months’ probation with twelve months of stayed condition time. The court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181404 - 2017-09-21
Helmbrecht on thirty months’ probation with twelve months of stayed condition time. The court rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181404 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the 139 days at issue in this case. Yanick involves the revocation of probation and addressed the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32922 - 2014-09-15
for the 139 days at issue in this case. Yanick involves the revocation of probation and addressed the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32922 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael L. Anderson
a hearing, and subsequently sentenced Anderson to twenty years in prison, followed by consecutive probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4599 - 2005-03-31
a hearing, and subsequently sentenced Anderson to twenty years in prison, followed by consecutive probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Vigil
and placed Vigil on three years’ probation. ¶9 Vigil filed motions seeking postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7435 - 2017-09-20
and placed Vigil on three years’ probation. ¶9 Vigil filed motions seeking postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7435 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
in favor of consecutive twenty years’ probation. A postconviction motion was denied, and LaSchum now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56807 - 2010-11-17
in favor of consecutive twenty years’ probation. A postconviction motion was denied, and LaSchum now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56807 - 2010-11-17
State v. Guy N. Giese
probation term imposed was an erroneous exercise of the sentencing court’s discretion. No postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
probation term imposed was an erroneous exercise of the sentencing court’s discretion. No postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10925 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Franklin argues the content of the PSI demonstrates bias in the probation agent who prepared it. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53663 - 2010-08-23
Franklin argues the content of the PSI demonstrates bias in the probation agent who prepared it. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53663 - 2010-08-23