Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14861 - 14870 of 65339 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 14861 - 14870 of 65339 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Veronica Reiter
whether the circuit court logically interpreted the facts of record and whether it applied the correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12058 - 2005-03-31
whether the circuit court logically interpreted the facts of record and whether it applied the correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12058 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger Lenox
exercised its discretion by imposing an unduly harsh and excessive sentence. Because the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion by imposing an unduly harsh and excessive sentence. Because the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin J. Tank
. Nothing in the record indicates that Tank was aware of the test results for this first sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13661 - 2005-03-31
. Nothing in the record indicates that Tank was aware of the test results for this first sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger Lenox
harsh and excessive sentence. No. 01-1773-CR 2 Because the record discloses a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4134 - 2017-09-20
harsh and excessive sentence. No. 01-1773-CR 2 Because the record discloses a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4134 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
appellate attorney and error by this court in our review of the record during the no-merit process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30255 - 2007-09-17
appellate attorney and error by this court in our review of the record during the no-merit process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30255 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101898 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101898 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wesley Rathburn v. Dallas
disregarded the corporate entity of WTTI and imposed personal liability on Rathburn. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5304 - 2017-09-19
disregarded the corporate entity of WTTI and imposed personal liability on Rathburn. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5304 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222361 - 2018-10-24
a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222361 - 2018-10-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and responses, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92926 - 2014-09-15
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and responses, we agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92926 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and video recordings. One search warrant was for the premises located at 14265 County Road F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237840 - 2019-03-21
and video recordings. One search warrant was for the premises located at 14265 County Road F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237840 - 2019-03-21