Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14891 - 14900 of 29991 for consulta de causas.

City of Elkhorn v. The 211 Centralia Street Corporation
de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Roebke v. Newell Co., 177 Wis. 2d 624
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6736 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
perform the same function as the trial court, making our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34605 - 2008-12-16

[PDF] Leo E. Borne v. Gonstead Advanced Techniques, Inc.
to de novo review. See Tower Special Facilities, Inc. v. Investment Club, Inc., 104 Wis. 2d 221, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5141 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 265
). However, the application of case law to a set of facts presents questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30761 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shelleen B. Joyner
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
omitted)). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bell, 380 Wis. 2d 616, ¶8. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296468 - 2020-10-20

State v. Jeremy P.
of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. McManus, 152 Wis. 2d 113, 129, 447 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7296 - 2005-03-31

Gaetano Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc.
are questions of law which we decide de novo. See Doyle v. Engelke, 219 Wis. 2d 277, 284, 580 N.W.2d 245 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14499 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 67
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buchanan, 2013 WI 31, ¶12, 346 Wis. 2d 735, 828 N.W.2d 847
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225413 - 2019-11-12

Sentry Insurance v. Rodney M. Davis
, we would consider de novo whether the record, including the disputed document, supports a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2998 - 2005-03-31