Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14941 - 14950 of 30177 for de.
Search results 14941 - 14950 of 30177 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal. Standards of Review ¶18 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30403 - 2007-09-26
appeal. Standards of Review ¶18 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30403 - 2007-09-26
[PDF]
Steven F. Weynand v. Lucille R. Weynand Foster
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15375 - 2017-09-21
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. See id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
they are clearly erroneous. See id. Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241247 - 2019-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26
State v. Peppertree Resort Villas, Inc.
De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4546 - 2005-03-31
De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 5
); WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106034 - 2017-09-21
); WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106034 - 2017-09-21
Agnes E. Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
for review. II ¶10 Statutory interpretation presents an issue of law which we review de novo. While
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21184 - 2006-01-30
for review. II ¶10 Statutory interpretation presents an issue of law which we review de novo. While
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21184 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted)). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bell, 380 Wis. 2d 616, ¶8. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296468 - 2020-10-20
omitted)). This is a question of law that we review de novo. Bell, 380 Wis. 2d 616, ¶8. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296468 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that decision de novo. Olson v. Farrar, 2012 WI 3, ¶24, 338 Wis. 2d 215, 809 N.W.2d 1. ¶7 “Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668031 - 2023-06-13
that decision de novo. Olson v. Farrar, 2012 WI 3, ¶24, 338 Wis. 2d 215, 809 N.W.2d 1. ¶7 “Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668031 - 2023-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
(1996) (statutory interpretation presents a question of law this court reviews de novo). In Landis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38860 - 2009-09-28
(1996) (statutory interpretation presents a question of law this court reviews de novo). In Landis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38860 - 2009-09-28