Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14941 - 14950 of 30072 for de.

[PDF] WI App 265
). However, the application of case law to a set of facts presents questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30761 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Naomi Anderson v. Con/Spec Corporation
to any such affirmative act and, therefore, it was entitled to JNOV. We review de novo a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11650 - 2017-09-19

City of Elkhorn v. The 211 Centralia Street Corporation
de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Roebke v. Newell Co., 177 Wis. 2d 624
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6736 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 5
); WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). We review de novo the grant or denial of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106034 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 87
on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36524 - 2014-09-15

South Milwaukee Savings Bank v. John Barrett
of a Wisconsin statute. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13440 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Steven G. Butzlaff v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
as the circuit court and consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13640 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816042 - 2024-06-25

COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court applied the correct legal standard is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47804 - 2010-03-10

COURT OF APPEALS
] de novo. See Peters, 166 Wis. 2d at 175. Whether a statement is admissible under a hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59522 - 2011-01-31