Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 29810 for des.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 67
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buchanan, 2013 WI 31, ¶12, 346 Wis. 2d 735, 828 N.W.2d 847
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225413 - 2019-11-12
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buchanan, 2013 WI 31, ¶12, 346 Wis. 2d 735, 828 N.W.2d 847
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225413 - 2019-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Harris
, are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶15 Because the trial court denied Harris’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2825 - 2017-09-19
, are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶15 Because the trial court denied Harris’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2825 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven G. Butzlaff v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
as the circuit court and consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13640 - 2017-09-21
as the circuit court and consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13640 - 2017-09-21
Gary L. Addison v. Grant County
the Adamses, based on the facts as found by the trial court, presents a question of law, which we decided de
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11022 - 2005-03-31
the Adamses, based on the facts as found by the trial court, presents a question of law, which we decided de
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11022 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
The construction of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14713 - 2005-03-31
The construction of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gregory T. Ross v. Specialty Risk Consultants, Inc.
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2134 - 2017-09-19
a summary judgment, we perform the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2134 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Shelleen B. Joyner
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41047 - 2009-09-16
. Standard of Review ¶10 We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41047 - 2009-09-16
[PDF]
Steven F. Weynand v. Lucille R. Weynand Foster
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15662 - 2017-09-21
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15662 - 2017-09-21
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar
. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review ¶10 Due process determinations are questions of law we decide de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18924 - 2005-07-06
. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review ¶10 Due process determinations are questions of law we decide de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18924 - 2005-07-06