Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 29821 for des.
Search results 14971 - 14980 of 29821 for des.
2008 WI APP 3
a grant of summary judgment by applying the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31261 - 2008-01-29
a grant of summary judgment by applying the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31261 - 2008-01-29
[PDF]
WI App 7
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Adams, 294 Wis. 2d 441, ¶26. ¶15 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57747 - 2014-09-15
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Adams, 294 Wis. 2d 441, ¶26. ¶15 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57747 - 2014-09-15
WI App 44 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP359 Complete Title of ...
(11).[2] DISCUSSION ¶12 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78961 - 2012-04-24
(11).[2] DISCUSSION ¶12 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78961 - 2012-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 9, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of A...
, 204 Wis. 2d at 104-05. Finally, we owe no deference to the Commission and will conduct a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46726 - 2010-02-08
, 204 Wis. 2d at 104-05. Finally, we owe no deference to the Commission and will conduct a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46726 - 2010-02-08
Trinity Lutheran Church v. Dorschner Excavating, Inc.
decide de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s conclusions. Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Cease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21570 - 2006-02-23
decide de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s conclusions. Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Cease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21570 - 2006-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” By contrast, appellate courts review de novo a trial court’s conclusions of law—even if the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913851 - 2025-02-12
.” By contrast, appellate courts review de novo a trial court’s conclusions of law—even if the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913851 - 2025-02-12
2009 WI App 87
judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315‑17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36524 - 2009-06-29
judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315‑17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36524 - 2009-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
was unconscionable. We disagree. ¶31 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123002 - 2014-10-01
was unconscionable. We disagree. ¶31 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123002 - 2014-10-01
Gregory T. Ross v. Specialty Risk Consultants, Inc.
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2134 - 2005-03-31
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2134 - 2005-03-31
Hunt Club Condominiums, Inc. v. Mac-Gray Services, Inc.
authorizes the Association to terminate the Mac-Gray lease is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26002 - 2006-08-29
authorizes the Association to terminate the Mac-Gray lease is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26002 - 2006-08-29