Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14981 - 14990 of 30172 for de.

South Milwaukee Savings Bank v. John Barrett
of a Wisconsin statute. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13440 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel D. King
review is de novo. See id., 115 Wis. 2d at 600, 340 N.W.2d at 916; State v. McBride, 187 Wis. 2d 409
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19747 - 2005-10-27

[PDF] NOTICE
as necessary. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29128 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jene R. Bodoh
as to the appropriate standard of review. Bodoh argues for a de novo standard of review and states that our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12104 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kohler Company v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.
on a question of law is de novo. See State ex rel. Bilder v. Township of Delavan, 112 Wis. 2d 539, 549, 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15369 - 2017-09-21

Samuels Recycling Company v. CNA Insurance Companies
N.W.2d 670, 673 (Ct. App. 1987). Although our review is de novo, we benefit from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13337 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same standards and methodology as the circuit court. Nettesheim v. S.G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539128 - 2022-07-07

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 30, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
Glasbrenner instead of to him. We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38618 - 2009-07-29

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
, however. Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment both are subject to our de novo review. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26280 - 2006-09-26

Sentry Insurance v. Rodney M. Davis
, we would consider de novo whether the record, including the disputed document, supports a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2998 - 2005-03-31