Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 14991 - 15000 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 14991 - 15000 of 63981 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
. Upon review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and responses, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106006 - 2013-12-19
. Upon review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and responses, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106006 - 2013-12-19
CA Blank Order
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101775 - 2013-09-09
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101775 - 2013-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
recording of the victim at trial violated his constitutional right to present a defense. Haydon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41446 - 2009-09-28
recording of the victim at trial violated his constitutional right to present a defense. Haydon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41446 - 2009-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
to a county trunk highway. The County has identified no facts in the record from which a reasonable jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101759 - 2013-09-10
to a county trunk highway. The County has identified no facts in the record from which a reasonable jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101759 - 2013-09-10
State v. John W. Rodgers
191, 200 (Ct. App. 1992). As a result, a complete record has not been made regarding the special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9363 - 2005-03-31
191, 200 (Ct. App. 1992). As a result, a complete record has not been made regarding the special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9363 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Smith could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Smith could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
CA Blank Order
filed a supplemental no-merit report. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96518 - 2013-05-05
filed a supplemental no-merit report. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96518 - 2013-05-05
[PDF]
State v. Luke C. Anderson
motion to withdraw the no contest plea, 2 Anderson argued that the record contains no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20861 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw the no contest plea, 2 Anderson argued that the record contains no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the records and the no-merit reports as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614254 - 2023-01-24
the records and the no-merit reports as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614254 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499191 - 2022-03-29
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499191 - 2022-03-29