Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1501 - 1510 of 4124 for in q.
Search results 1501 - 1510 of 4124 for in q.
COURT OF APPEALS
beatings of her when the State objected: Q Were these … injuries that you’ve got
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06
beatings of her when the State objected: Q Were these … injuries that you’ve got
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-examination illustrates why this nexus is significant here: Q. When [Donald] spoke to you about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217151 - 2018-08-07
-examination illustrates why this nexus is significant here: Q. When [Donald] spoke to you about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217151 - 2018-08-07
State v. Michael J.K.
examination, Leverson testified: Q You didn't inform him of his rights because he was not in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15909 - 2005-03-31
examination, Leverson testified: Q You didn't inform him of his rights because he was not in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15909 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
noted. [2] During cross-examination of Hughes, these exchanges occurred: Q. And your tax records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30392 - 2007-09-26
noted. [2] During cross-examination of Hughes, these exchanges occurred: Q. And your tax records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30392 - 2007-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
? ANo. Q You are not? ANo. Q Were you at that time? A No. QWere you the advisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9492 - 2017-09-19
? ANo. Q You are not? ANo. Q Were you at that time? A No. QWere you the advisor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9492 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard J. Size
Department with you? A: Right. Q: What was his response? A:At first, he asked me if he had to. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11132 - 2005-03-31
Department with you? A: Right. Q: What was his response? A:At first, he asked me if he had to. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11132 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and sentencing hearing contains the following exchange between Bethel and the court: Q: …. Mr. Bethel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33184 - 2008-06-25
and sentencing hearing contains the following exchange between Bethel and the court: Q: …. Mr. Bethel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33184 - 2008-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the conversation. The prosecutor and Farris then engaged in the following colloquy: Q: Do you remember what you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85764 - 2012-08-07
the conversation. The prosecutor and Farris then engaged in the following colloquy: Q: Do you remember what you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85764 - 2012-08-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
between Bethel and the court: Q: …. Mr. Bethel, this complaint further alleges the habitual offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33184 - 2014-09-15
between Bethel and the court: Q: …. Mr. Bethel, this complaint further alleges the habitual offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33184 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in a way to get agreement from those questioned: Q. And there is a way that you direct questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34701 - 2014-09-15
in a way to get agreement from those questioned: Q. And there is a way that you direct questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34701 - 2014-09-15