Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15111 - 15120 of 30177 for de.
Search results 15111 - 15120 of 30177 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816042 - 2024-06-25
review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence de novo. State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816042 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
WI App 67
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buchanan, 2013 WI 31, ¶12, 346 Wis. 2d 735, 828 N.W.2d 847
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225413 - 2019-11-12
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buchanan, 2013 WI 31, ¶12, 346 Wis. 2d 735, 828 N.W.2d 847
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225413 - 2019-11-12
[PDF]
Samuels Recycling Company v. CNA Insurance Companies
670, 673 (Ct. App. 1987). Although our review is de novo, we benefit from the trial court’s careful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13337 - 2017-09-21
670, 673 (Ct. App. 1987). Although our review is de novo, we benefit from the trial court’s careful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13337 - 2017-09-21
Peace Lutheran Church and Academy v. Village of Sussex
In a certiorari action, the appellate court conducts a de novo review of the Board’s and not the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2962 - 2007-05-16
In a certiorari action, the appellate court conducts a de novo review of the Board’s and not the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2962 - 2007-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
, however. Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment both are subject to our de novo review. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26280 - 2006-09-26
, however. Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment both are subject to our de novo review. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26280 - 2006-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether they are in privity. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Pasko, 252 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135365 - 2017-09-21
is whether they are in privity. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Pasko, 252 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
at 866. Whether the facts satisfy the legal standard in Innis is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10656 - 2017-09-20
at 866. Whether the facts satisfy the legal standard in Innis is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10656 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 7
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Adams, 294 Wis. 2d 441, ¶26. ¶15 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57747 - 2014-09-15
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Adams, 294 Wis. 2d 441, ¶26. ¶15 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57747 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.’” Bokenyi, 355 Wis. 2d 28, ¶38 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670974 - 2023-06-27
of a plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.’” Bokenyi, 355 Wis. 2d 28, ¶38 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670974 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
the lowest, it was error for the court to use $120,000.00.” We conclude this difference is de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35394 - 2014-09-15
the lowest, it was error for the court to use $120,000.00.” We conclude this difference is de minimus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35394 - 2014-09-15