Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
tests and the results, according to the deputy, indicated intoxication. The deputy later transported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79851 - 2014-09-15
tests and the results, according to the deputy, indicated intoxication. The deputy later transported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79851 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael A. Decker
test. Decker asserts that the Department of Transportation approved the instrument using “standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7260 - 2005-03-31
test. Decker asserts that the Department of Transportation approved the instrument using “standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7260 - 2005-03-31
State v. David K. Marks
officer's request that he perform field sobriety tests converted his detention into an arrest, which needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10968 - 2005-03-31
officer's request that he perform field sobriety tests converted his detention into an arrest, which needed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10968 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Decker
test. Decker asserts that the Department of Transportation approved the instrument using “standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7260 - 2017-09-20
test. Decker asserts that the Department of Transportation approved the instrument using “standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7260 - 2017-09-20
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
test——prejudicial reliance[2]——when it affirmed the circuit court. We must, therefore, reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
test——prejudicial reliance[2]——when it affirmed the circuit court. We must, therefore, reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08
State v. James F.R., Jr.
have been granted, we conclude that the second statement was admissible after applying the test found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13517 - 2005-03-31
have been granted, we conclude that the second statement was admissible after applying the test found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Warren
), STATS., be brought as a single count. Applying Wisconsin's well-settled, two-part multiplicity test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15005 - 2017-09-21
), STATS., be brought as a single count. Applying Wisconsin's well-settled, two-part multiplicity test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15005 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roger L. Warren
. Applying Wisconsin's well-settled, two-part multiplicity test, see, e.g., State v. Anderson, 219 Wis.2d 740
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
. Applying Wisconsin's well-settled, two-part multiplicity test, see, e.g., State v. Anderson, 219 Wis.2d 740
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15005 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Adrienne Luber
at the State Hygiene Lab testified that he performed No. 00-0456-CR 5 tests on a blood sample from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
at the State Hygiene Lab testified that he performed No. 00-0456-CR 5 tests on a blood sample from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James F.R., Jr.
the test found in Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985). Finally, James’s argument that he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13517 - 2017-09-21
the test found in Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985). Finally, James’s argument that he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13517 - 2017-09-21