Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15131 - 15140 of 30066 for de.
Search results 15131 - 15140 of 30066 for de.
[PDF]
David L. Gilbert v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. § 71.75. Statutory No. 00-2154 4 interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2903 - 2017-09-19
. § 71.75. Statutory No. 00-2154 4 interpretation presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2903 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92439 - 2013-02-04
, but we review de novo questions of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92439 - 2013-02-04
State v. Larry G. Edwards
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party disputes that "[n]o right of appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party disputes that "[n]o right of appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
to de novo review.” Id. (italics added). In Schaefer, we summarized the applicable analysis: We employ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91546 - 2013-01-14
to de novo review.” Id. (italics added). In Schaefer, we summarized the applicable analysis: We employ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91546 - 2013-01-14
Bruce Mieloch v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
been denied this due process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28155 - 2014-09-15
been denied this due process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28155 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). ¶8 At the County’s request, on December 4, 2009, the circuit court held a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
)(a). ¶8 At the County’s request, on December 4, 2009, the circuit court held a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
is also de novo, and we apply the same standards and methods as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4886 - 2017-09-19
is also de novo, and we apply the same standards and methods as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4886 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06