Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15251 - 15260 of 83457 for case code.
Search results 15251 - 15260 of 83457 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
and affirming the dismissal and remand of this case to the municipal court. Because we determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27591 - 2006-12-26
and affirming the dismissal and remand of this case to the municipal court. Because we determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27591 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
law of the case doctrine by concluding Wieczorek was unlawfully seized because we determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101687 - 2017-09-21
law of the case doctrine by concluding Wieczorek was unlawfully seized because we determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motions in each of the circuit court cases underlying these appeals, and the circuit court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205014 - 2017-12-11
motions in each of the circuit court cases underlying these appeals, and the circuit court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205014 - 2017-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
address in this case—a circuit court’s competency and the interpretation of a statute—are issues of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
address in this case—a circuit court’s competency and the interpretation of a statute—are issues of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206044 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848671 - 2024-09-11
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848671 - 2024-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case doctrine by concluding Wieczorek was unlawfully seized because we determined the seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
of the case doctrine by concluding Wieczorek was unlawfully seized because we determined the seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 13-04 - Response from Office of Lawyer Regulation
trial judge: manage 2 cases efficiently, decide pretrial motions effectively, apply
/supreme/docs/1304responseolr.pdf - 2013-09-18
trial judge: manage 2 cases efficiently, decide pretrial motions effectively, apply
/supreme/docs/1304responseolr.pdf - 2013-09-18
[PDF]
DSC Letterhead
Officer communications@wicourts.gov (608) 261-6640 Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts four cases
/supreme/docs/0126cal.pdf - 2026-01-23
Officer communications@wicourts.gov (608) 261-6640 Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts four cases
/supreme/docs/0126cal.pdf - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and forfeitures in Waukesha County circuit court case Nos. 2004CM940, 2007CT2518, 2008TR9102, and 2013TR5557
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191001 - 2017-09-21
and forfeitures in Waukesha County circuit court case Nos. 2004CM940, 2007CT2518, 2008TR9102, and 2013TR5557
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191001 - 2017-09-21
State v. Juergen Huebner
in misdemeanor cases shall consist of 6 persons.”), violated Article I, § 7 of the Wisconsin Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14429 - 2005-03-31
in misdemeanor cases shall consist of 6 persons.”), violated Article I, § 7 of the Wisconsin Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14429 - 2005-03-31