Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15401 - 15410 of 30164 for de.
Search results 15401 - 15410 of 30164 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Michael Bartz
Ross v. State, 61 Wis.2d 160, 171-72, 211 N.W.2d 827, 833 (1973). We conduct our review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19
Ross v. State, 61 Wis.2d 160, 171-72, 211 N.W.2d 827, 833 (1973). We conduct our review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
[PDF]
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103683 - 2013-10-30
effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103683 - 2013-10-30
State v. John Tereschko
is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992). On review of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992). On review of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 75
of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v. Wisconsin No. 2008AP2069 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36204 - 2014-09-15
of the sheriff is a question of law that we review de novo. See Kocken v. Wisconsin No. 2008AP2069 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36204 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under WIS. STAT. § 971.23 includes not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36117 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under WIS. STAT. § 971.23 includes not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87717 - 2014-09-15
for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Scott F. Anderson v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
contempt power. This is a legal question that this court reviews de novo. See Old Republic Sur. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
contempt power. This is a legal question that this court reviews de novo. See Old Republic Sur. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mandatory duties at a plea hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Id., ¶21. ¶13 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199280 - 2017-10-31
mandatory duties at a plea hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Id., ¶21. ¶13 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199280 - 2017-10-31