Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15591 - 15600 of 68339 for law.

Mark Shimkus v. Kenneth Sondalle
The interpretation of a statute and its application to a known set of facts presents a question of law, which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2431 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willy J. Love
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216, 395
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP2263-CR 2 results of her blood test because the implied consent law was violated when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Posorske contends that: (1) dismissal with prejudice was required as a matter of law because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640502 - 2023-04-04

[PDF] Barbara A. Meyers v. Bayer AG
that Bayer violated WIS. STAT. § 133.03 (2003-04)1 antitrust laws by conspiring to inflate the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25054 - 2017-09-21

Woodland/Alloy Casting, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
a hearing before the administrative law judge. He filed a petition for review with LIRC, which concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2209 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law.” WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). “We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17

[PDF] Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
is a question of law which this court determines de novo. McCarthy v. McCarthy, 146 Wis. 2d 510, 513-14, 431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Roger G. Merry, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113750 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Estate of Harold Seidl v. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
, the court determined it could not accept the verdict because the jury ignored the law and the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25952 - 2017-09-21