Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1561 - 1570 of 73966 for public records.

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
sentencing discretion by placing too much emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9586 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
sentencing discretion by placing too much emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy against interference with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9588 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Beyan K. Stanley
to file a response. Stanley has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13935 - 2014-09-15

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy against interference with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9587 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
sentencing discretion by placing too much emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9588 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
sentencing discretion by placing too much emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9589 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy against interference with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9589 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
emphasis on his juvenile record. There is a strong public policy against interference with the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9586 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael A. VanPatter
needs of the offender; and (3) the need for protection of the public. Id. In reviewing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10505 - 2005-03-31