Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 6147 for li.
Search results 1571 - 1580 of 6147 for li.
State v. Thomas E. Thompson, Jr.
unreasonable and excessive. ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21395 - 2006-02-14
unreasonable and excessive. ¶4 Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21395 - 2006-02-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that Vis stole and forged his mother’s checks without his knowledge, and Vis lied to him when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151037 - 2017-09-21
testified that Vis stole and forged his mother’s checks without his knowledge, and Vis lied to him when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151037 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
) exclusive jurisdiction over reckless driving charges lies in adult court from the time a defendant turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36256 - 2009-04-22
) exclusive jurisdiction over reckless driving charges lies in adult court from the time a defendant turns
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36256 - 2009-04-22
State v. Daniel J. Voigt
a breach, the determination of whether that breach was substantial and material lies within the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
a breach, the determination of whether that breach was substantial and material lies within the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14761 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
ordered. See § 973.20(7). Thus, Flores seeks to challenge a discretionary sentencing decision that lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73605 - 2011-11-14
ordered. See § 973.20(7). Thus, Flores seeks to challenge a discretionary sentencing decision that lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73605 - 2011-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of maintenance lies within the trial court’s discretion.”). Our sole conclusion is that Peter has demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798744 - 2024-05-08
of maintenance lies within the trial court’s discretion.”). Our sole conclusion is that Peter has demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798744 - 2024-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
,” the court accepted “impossible testimony as convincing evidence,” and “the [County’s] witness … lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97435 - 2013-05-28
,” the court accepted “impossible testimony as convincing evidence,” and “the [County’s] witness … lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97435 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
Standard of Review. ¶6 Whether to vacate a default judgment is a determination that lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4529 - 2017-09-19
Standard of Review. ¶6 Whether to vacate a default judgment is a determination that lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4529 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and there was evidence on both sides of the issue. We agree. ¶9 The decision whether to grant a mistrial lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39950 - 2014-09-15
, and there was evidence on both sides of the issue. We agree. ¶9 The decision whether to grant a mistrial lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39950 - 2014-09-15
Gary L. Janz v. Mark Ferkey
, which is where the property at issue in this case lies.[1] As we have described, Paragraph B-1 declares
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21066 - 2006-01-25
, which is where the property at issue in this case lies.[1] As we have described, Paragraph B-1 declares
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21066 - 2006-01-25