Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15701 - 15710 of 30072 for de.
Search results 15701 - 15710 of 30072 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
requirement of reasonableness is a question of a law, which we review de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
requirement of reasonableness is a question of a law, which we review de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28697 - 2007-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64232 - 2011-05-17
a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64232 - 2011-05-17
State v. Robert C. Knight
de novo. See id. at 973, 468 N.W.2d at 701. ¶11 Whether Knight had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15116 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See id. at 973, 468 N.W.2d at 701. ¶11 Whether Knight had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15116 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Kazim Investment, Inc.
application of the statute to undisputed facts present a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6160 - 2017-09-19
application of the statute to undisputed facts present a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6160 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, for questions of statutory construction, such as this one, our review is de novo. Stuart v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
. However, for questions of statutory construction, such as this one, our review is de novo. Stuart v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), Stats.[4] “Nevertheless, we recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7958 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), Stats.[4] “Nevertheless, we recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7958 - 2005-03-31
Richard F. Salewske v. Leroy W. Depies
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Dane County, 142 Wis. 2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16261 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Dane County, 142 Wis. 2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Pierre A. LaForte v. Timothy W. Bandoli
We review the trial court's decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2583 - 2017-09-19
We review the trial court's decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2583 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the argument sections of Moreno’s briefs seemingly invite this court to determine de novo that Ann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233633 - 2019-01-29
, the argument sections of Moreno’s briefs seemingly invite this court to determine de novo that Ann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233633 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
State v. Reginold B. Trussell
and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21
and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See id. at 137-38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21