Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15731 - 15740 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15731 - 15740 of 30012 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
State v. Joe J. Davis
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310 (citations omitted). A circuit court may refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310 (citations omitted). A circuit court may refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16308 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of undisputed facts to a statute. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14
the application of undisputed facts to a statute. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35614 - 2009-04-14
[PDF]
WI APP 91
review both questions de novo. See State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15
review both questions de novo. See State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
, 278 N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Ackerman v. Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630522 - 2023-03-09
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Ackerman v. Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630522 - 2023-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
State v. Miguel Rocha-Castro
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5109 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5109 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21