Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15731 - 15740 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15731 - 15740 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 973.046(1r)(b) violates his due process rights. We review de novo the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180829 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
erroneous. See id. “We review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233552 - 2019-01-29
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, since the trial court “has no discretion” to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, since the trial court “has no discretion” to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
bears the burden of proving prejudice, and we “‘review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2010-11-23
bears the burden of proving prejudice, and we “‘review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57070 - 2010-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 174, ¶12. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
. 2d 174, ¶12. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶6 In State v. Anderson, 142 Wis. 2d 162, 417 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33709 - 2008-08-12
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶6 In State v. Anderson, 142 Wis. 2d 162, 417 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33709 - 2008-08-12
County of Fond du Lac v. Jay D. Graff
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). Despite our de novo standard of review, we nonetheless value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19211 - 2005-07-31
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). Despite our de novo standard of review, we nonetheless value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19211 - 2005-07-31
Frontsheet
Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6218 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6218 - 2005-03-31