Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15821 - 15830 of 29832 for des.
Search results 15821 - 15830 of 29832 for des.
State v. Owen Andrew Kreinus
(1983). ¶13 Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18
(1983). ¶13 Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 I review de novo the circuit court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 I review de novo the circuit court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05
[PDF]
Richard Zeininger v. Affordable Builders of Wisconsin, Inc.
, interpretation of a settlement agreement presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Borchardt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8349 - 2017-09-19
, interpretation of a settlement agreement presents a question of law which we review de novo. See Borchardt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8349 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Confucius Gooden
of a plea agreement presents an issue of law which we review de novo. See State v. Poole, 131 Wis.2d 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
of a plea agreement presents an issue of law which we review de novo. See State v. Poole, 131 Wis.2d 359
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing on the motion, the circuit court granted it. Roehl appeals. ¶6 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247669 - 2019-10-02
a hearing on the motion, the circuit court granted it. Roehl appeals. ¶6 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247669 - 2019-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo.” Salinas, 369 Wis. 2d 9, ¶30. We owe no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
review de novo.” Salinas, 369 Wis. 2d 9, ¶30. We owe no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
COURT OF APPEALS
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Elyse Joransen-Hamilton Knutson v. Richard C. Knutson
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2790 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct. App. 1998). The aim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2790 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mary Aiello v. Village of Pleasant Prairie
of law which we review de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9061 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9061 - 2017-09-19